Explanatory note on time

IAU Commission 31 (Time)

12th General Assembly during 1964 August

The proceedings of the meeting of IAU Commission 31 point out that

The distinction between time epoch and time interval is not clear to everyone.
In effort to remedy that situation W. Markowitz, H.M. Smith, and L. Essen introduced an explanatory note on time.

These three noteworthy individuals have stellar biographies related to the subject of time.
L. Essen was the co-developer of the first cesium atomic chronometer at the UK NPL.
W. Markowitz was the Director of Time at the USNO, had worked on the creation of Ephemeris Time, had been chair of IAU Comm. 31 when Essen announced the cesium chronometer, and immediately acted to perform the calibration of astronomical time scales with the cesium atomic time scale.
H.M. Smith worked at the Greenwich Observatory Time Service and spent the 1970s working with the CCIR to get other agencies to adopt the new UTC with its leap seconds.

This explanatory note was incorporated into the resolutions of the General Assembly (see page 16). Here is the French text. Below is an English translation.

  1. The IAU notes that it would be useful to articulate the distinction between the two aspects of the concept of time, namely, the epoch (instant) and the time interval, and the utility of various time scales.
  2. The epoch of U.T. is determined by the angular position of the Earth about its axis; it is required for various scientific and technical purposes and for civil purposes, sometimes without delay.
  3. A unit of atomic time (A.T.), based on a quantum transition, suitable as a physical unit of time interval has come into practical use since 1955. The adoption of a particular transition for the definition of the physical second is the responsibility of the General Conference of Weights and Measures.
  4. E.T. is the time that suits celestial mechanics whose immediate work requires neither the knowledge of the epoch, nor the unit of time interval.
  5. The IAU recognizes that physicists need the second of atomic time, but insists on the need to provide users, continuously and without delay, the epoch of U.T.
  6. Therefore the need exists for radio emissions to provide both the epoch of U.T. and the unit of interval of A.T. This has been done since 1959.
  7. The method for providing the two is possible because
    1. the epoch of U.T.2 need not be known without immediate correction to within a tolerance of 0.1 s and
    2. frequency can be kept constant with respect to atomic standards for periods of one or more years by means of a known frequency offset.
    Via this method, coherence is maintained between time signals and the frequency of the carrier wave.
  8. We recognize that other methods of compromise are possible. However, the current system seems best suited to many common requirements.
  9. We recognize that it would be desirable to transmit the epoch of U.T.2 and the unit of time interval without steps of time nor offsets of frequency.

During the subsequent five years the characteristics of the radio broadcast time scale were re-discussed at many more meetings. Despite warnings from astronomers, in 1970 the CCIR decided to implement a new compromise. With no foresight for the problems that would ensue, the leap second was instituted in 1972.

During the decade after the CCIR implemented the leap second in the radio broadcasts they renamed the time scale UTC and promoted the use of the time scale for all applications. As a result UTC with leap seconds was adopted as the perfectly commendable solution by the CCDS, CGPM, IAU, ITU, CCITT, and national governments.

Unfortunately the POSIX committee did not understand the implications of the leap second and considered that precise time was not important for computing. They disregarded advice to allow the leap second to be counted as part of the time scale used in computers, yet they still chose to specify that computers should use UTC. These failures to communicate and comprehend now cause trouble at each successive leap second.