Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap seconds

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Peter Bunclark <psb_at_AST.CAM.AC.UK>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:20:02 +0000 (GMT)

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> finger ut1_at_bipm.fr

You mean dut1_at_bipm.fr? That would be quiet useful. Otherwise let's not
bother with NTP protocol, just finger_at_sometimesever!

Pete.
Received on Sun Jan 08 2006 - 07:20:34 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Allen: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap seconds"
Previous message: Ed Davies: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap seconds"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT