Re: Introduction of long term scheduling

From: Ashley Yakeley <ashley_at_SEMANTIC.ORG>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:25:55 -0800

On Jan 6, 2007, at 16:18, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> Unfortunately, the kernel has to have a notion of time stepping around
> a leap-second if it implements ntp. There's no way around that that
> isn't horribly expensive or difficult to code. The reasons for the
> kernel's need to know have been enumerated elsewhere...

Presumably it only needs to know the next leap-second to do this, not
the whole known table?

Ashley Yakeley
Received on Sat Jan 06 2007 - 16:35:44 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT