Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling

From: Steve Allen <sla_at_UCOLICK.ORG>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:43:25 -0800

On Tue 2007-01-02T18:36:45 +0000, Ed Davies hath writ:
> >A positive or negative leap-second should be the last second
> >of a UTC month, but first preference should be given to the end
> >of December and June, and second preference to the end of March
> >and September.
>
> Anybody got access to a proper copy and can say whether that's
> right or not? If it is right then the Wikipedia article on leap
> seconds needs fixing.

That's a direct quote.

--
Steve Allen                 <sla_at_ucolick.org>                WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory        Natural Sciences II, Room 165    Lat  +36.99858
University of California    Voice: +1 831 459 3046           Lng -122.06014
Santa Cruz, CA 95064        http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/     Hgt +250 m
Received on Tue Jan 02 2007 - 11:07:54 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:56 PDT