Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!

From: Peter Bunclark <>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:51:23 +0000 (GMT)

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> The short answer is that you cannot get a time feed of TAI, so the
So isn't this one of the things we want to fix in the brave new world of
joined-up timekeeping? Distribute (very close to) TAI, keep the kernel
PLLs sweet, move leap second handling to user-space and thus make
debugging very easy, then everone can get their timescale of choice as
a f(TAI)?

Received on Sun Jan 22 2006 - 10:52:05 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT