LEAPSECS at USNO by date

SubjectAuthorDate
Who will be voting?William ThompsonWednesday, 5 July 2000
Politics of Redefining UTCDemetrios Thursday, 6 July 2000
posting to the leapsecs listsenior.ken_at_usno.navy.milThursday, 6 July 2000
FW: GPS World Article on Leap Secondsmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milMonday, 10 July 2000
Re: Report of URSI Comm. J WG on Leap SecondsRob SeamanFriday, 14 July 2000
leap second policy makingRob SeamanFriday, 14 July 2000
Re: leap second policy makingSteve AllenFriday, 14 July 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap second policy makingDemetrios Monday, 17 July 2000
Re: leap second policy makingRob SeamanFriday, 21 July 2000
USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachSeeds, GlenMonday, 14 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachBrian GarrettMonday, 14 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachSteve AllenTuesday, 15 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachJohn CowanThursday, 17 August 2000
Re: USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachRob SeamanSaturday, 19 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachJohn CowanSaturday, 19 August 2000
Re: USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachRob SeamanTuesday, 22 August 2000
lead or follow?Steve AllenTuesday, 22 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] USNO leap seconds - a minmum-change approachJohn CowanTuesday, 22 August 2000
Re: leap second policy making (correction)Rob SeamanWednesday, 30 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap second policy making (correction)Demetrios Wednesday, 30 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap second policy making (correction)Clive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 30 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianMichael DeckersThursday, 31 August 2000
Re: floating prime meridianRob SeamanThursday, 31 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianJohn CowanThursday, 31 August 2000
Re: floating prime meridianRob SeamanThursday, 31 August 2000
Re: floating prime meridianJoseph S. MyersThursday, 31 August 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianRick Thomas - RichardFriday, 1 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianJohn CowanFriday, 1 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianSteve AllenWednesday, 6 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianJohn CowanWednesday, 6 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianSteve AllenThursday, 7 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] floating prime meridianJohn CowanThursday, 7 September 2000
Types of timeKen PizziniFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeRoger StapletonFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeJohn CowanFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeJohn CowanFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeRoger StapletonFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeSteve AllenFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeJohn CowanFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Types of timeSteve AllenFriday, 8 September 2000
Re: Types of timeRob SeamanFriday, 8 September 2000
what is broken?Steve AllenTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] what is broken?Fred PattTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] what is broken?Steve AllenTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] what is broken?Rick Thomas - RichardTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: what is broken?Joseph S. MyersTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: what is broken?Steve AllenTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: what is broken?Joseph S. MyersTuesday, 19 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] what is broken?Fred PattThursday, 21 September 2000
advertisingsenior.ken_at_usno.navy.milWednesday, 27 September 2000
IAU ResolutionDemetrios Friday, 29 September 2000
consumer-quality clocksSteve AllenFriday, 29 September 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] consumer-quality clocksDemetrios Saturday, 30 September 2000
RE: [LEAPSECS] consumer-quality clocksmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milSaturday, 30 September 2000
Re: consumer-quality clocksJoseph S. MyersSunday, 1 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] consumer-quality clocksSteve AllenSunday, 1 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] consumer-quality clocksBrian GarrettSunday, 1 October 2000
Re: Leap Second ReportSteve AllenSunday, 1 October 2000
Re: what is broken?Glen SeedsWednesday, 18 October 2000
Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time (UTS)Markus KuhnWednesday, 25 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time(UTS)John CowanWednesday, 25 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time(UTS)Steve AllenWednesday, 25 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated UniversalTime(UTS)John CowanWednesday, 25 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time(UTS)Clive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 25 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time (UTS)Tom Van BaakWednesday, 25 October 2000
Re: Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated UniversalTime(UTS)Markus KuhnMonday, 30 October 2000
Re: Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time(UTS)Markus KuhnMonday, 30 October 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposal for a Smoothed Coordinated Universal Time(UTS)Clive D.W. FeatherMonday, 30 October 2000
where did the archives go?Rob SeamanFriday, 17 November 2000
Re: where did the archives go?Rob SeamanMonday, 27 November 2000
PTTI?Rob SeamanTuesday, 5 December 2000
Viruses, ITU, and PTTImatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILFriday, 8 December 2000
Re: Viruses, ITU, and PTTIRob SeamanSunday, 10 December 2000
Re: [LEAPSECS] Viruses, ITU, and PTTIDemetrios MatsakisMonday, 11 December 2000
[LEAPSECS] archive recoveryKen SeniorSaturday, 6 January 2001
[LEAPSECS] PTTI discussions?Rob SeamanTuesday, 16 January 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] PTTI discussions?Demetrios MatsakisTuesday, 16 January 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] PTTI discussions?Rob SeamanThursday, 1 March 2001
[LEAPSECS] EFTF Discussion on Leap SecondsDemetrios MatsakisMonday, 12 March 2001
[LEAPSECS] PTTI leap second discussionDemetrios MatsakisFriday, 30 March 2001
[LEAPSECS] Discussion at Civil GPS MeetingDemetrios MatsakisFriday, 30 March 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] PTTI leap second discussionSteve AllenSunday, 1 April 2001
Re: Rejected posting to LEAPSECS_at_CLOCKDEV.USNO.NAVY.MILJohn CowanTuesday, 3 April 2001
Upgrade, don't degradeRob SeamanMonday, 9 April 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] Upgrade, don't degradeKen PizziniMonday, 9 April 2001
RE: [LEAPSECS] Upgrade, don't degradeSeeds, GlenTuesday, 10 April 2001
Re: Upgrade, don't degradeJohn CowanMonday, 16 April 2001
Re: Upgrade, don't degradePaul EggertTuesday, 8 May 2001
Special Rapporteur Group Metmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milWednesday, 23 May 2001
Special Rapporteur Group (ascii version)matsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milThursday, 24 May 2001
Special Rapporteur Group (readable ascii version)Markus KuhnThursday, 24 May 2001
UTS ProposalMarkus KuhnThursday, 24 May 2001
[LEAPSECS] how do computer people want their time clocked?Deckers, MichaelMonday, 28 May 2001
Re: how do computer people want their time clocked?Paul EggertMonday, 28 May 2001
Re: how do computer people want their time clocked?Garrett WollmanTuesday, 29 May 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] how do computer people want their time clocked?Deckers, MichaelWednesday, 30 May 2001
Re: how do computer people want their time clocked?Paul EggertWednesday, 30 May 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] how do computer people want their time clocked?Gyrgy SzondyWednesday, 30 May 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] how do computer people want their time clocked?Deckers, MichaelThursday, 31 May 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] how do computer people want their time clocked?Markus KuhnThursday, 31 May 2001
Re: how do computer people want their time clocked?Paul EggertThursday, 31 May 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] how do computer people want their time clocked?Deckers, MichaelFriday, 1 June 2001
Leap Second Presentation at Civil GPS Meeting, Sept. 2001matsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 16 October 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap Second Presentation at Civil GPS Meeting, Sept. 2001Markus KuhnWednesday, 17 October 2001
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap Second Presentation at Civil GPS Meeting, Sept. 2001Ken PizziniThursday, 18 October 2001
[LEAPSECS] Opinions Solicitedmatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILTuesday, 8 January 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Opinions SolicitedRob SeamanFriday, 11 January 2002
[LEAPSECS] Metrologia Papermatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILThursday, 28 March 2002
[LEAPSECS] Meeting of ITU/R Special Rapporteur Groupmatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILThursday, 28 March 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Meeting of ITU/R Special Rapporteur Groupmatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILTuesday, 9 April 2002
[LEAPSECS] UTC Questionnaire (fwd)Markus KuhnMonday, 27 May 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC Questionnaire (fwd)Steven WolfeWednesday, 19 June 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC Questionnaire (fwd)Ken SeniorThursday, 20 June 2002
[LEAPSECS] URSI-wide Working Group on the Leap Secondmatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILSaturday, 7 September 2002
[LEAPSECS] your e-mailJames JohnsonSaturday, 7 September 2002
[LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Rob SeamanWednesday, 27 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?James JohnsonWednesday, 27 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?matsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILWednesday, 27 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Seeds, GlenWednesday, 27 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?James JohnsonWednesday, 27 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Rob SeamanWednesday, 27 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Markus KuhnThursday, 28 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?John CowanThursday, 28 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Seeds, GlenThursday, 28 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Markus KuhnThursday, 28 November 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?James JohnsonSunday, 1 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Rob SeamanMonday, 2 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?John CowanMonday, 2 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Rob SeamanTuesday, 3 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?John CowanTuesday, 3 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Seeds, GlenWednesday, 4 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Rob SeamanWednesday, 4 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?John CowanWednesday, 4 December 2002
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Ed DaviesWednesday, 4 December 2002
[LEAPSECS] Official Announcement of Conference on UTC Timescalematsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILTuesday, 7 January 2003
[LEAPSECS] Official Announcement of Conference on UTC Timescalematsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILTuesday, 7 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Markus KuhnTuesday, 7 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Official Announcement of Conference on UTC TimescaleRob SeamanTuesday, 7 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Gyrgy SzondyTuesday, 7 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap second status?Rob SeamanTuesday, 7 January 2003
Draft Questionnairematsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 14 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireBill KlepczynskiTuesday, 14 January 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireSeeds, GlenFriday, 17 January 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Draft Questionnairematsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILFriday, 17 January 2003
Re: Draft QuestionnaireSteve AllenFriday, 17 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireEd DaviesSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireRob SeamanSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireJohn CowanSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireJohn CowanSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireJoseph S. MyersSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireJohn CowanSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireJoseph S. MyersSaturday, 18 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireEd DaviesSunday, 19 January 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireSeeds, GlenMonday, 20 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Draft QuestionnaireRoger StapletonMonday, 20 January 2003
what should a time standard encompass?Ken PizziniFriday, 24 January 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Seeds, GlenFriday, 24 January 2003
Re: what should a time standard encompass?Ken PizziniFriday, 24 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Ed DaviesSaturday, 25 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Ken PizziniSaturday, 25 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Steve AllenSaturday, 25 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Markus KuhnMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Peter BunclarkMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?William ThompsonMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Peter BunclarkMonday, 27 January 2003
unsubscribeAntero LeinonenMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Steve AllenMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Ed DaviesMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?William ThompsonMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Steve AllenMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Steve AllenMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Ed DaviesMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Steve AllenMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?Rob SeamanMonday, 27 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] what should a time standard encompass?John CowanTuesday, 28 January 2003
What I do. What do you do?Rob SeamanTuesday, 28 January 2003
Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveMark.Calabretta_at_ATNF.CSIRO.AUTuesday, 28 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveJohn CowanTuesday, 28 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveSteve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What I do. What do you do?Ken PizziniWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveKen PizziniWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: What I do. What do you do?Steve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
FITS and the crafting of standardsSteve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] FITS and the crafting of standardsRoger StapletonWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveJohn CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What I do. What do you do?John CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What I do. What do you do?Markus KuhnWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What I do. What do you do?Ed DaviesWednesday, 29 January 2003
[LEAPSECS] Telescope pointing and UTC, was: Re: What I do. What do you do?Ed DaviesWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] FITS and the crafting of standardsJohn CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Markus KuhnWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Steve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?William ThompsonWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Steve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Telescope pointing and UTC, was: Re: What I do. What do you do?Steve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Rob SeamanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Steve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What I do. What do you do?Mark CalabrettaWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveMark CalabrettaWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Mark CalabrettaWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Mark CalabrettaWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspectiveJohn CowanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Rob SeamanWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Ken PizziniWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Telescope pointing and UTC, was: Re: What I do. What do you do?Steve AllenWednesday, 29 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Ken PizziniThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Steve AllenThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Markus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: Leap seconds in the European 50.0 Hz power gridMarkus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
GLONASS leap second problems just a legend?Markus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Markus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Markus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: Calabretta's 86400 s + epsilon day proposalMarkus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?William ThompsonThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: Unix notion of "Seconds since the Epoch"Markus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Markus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Unix notion of "Seconds since the Epoch"John CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?John CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
[LEAPSECS] Long live UT1Ed DaviesThursday, 30 January 2003
[LEAPSECS] Trivial leap second "problem" exampleEd DaviesThursday, 30 January 2003
[LEAPSECS] Epsilon proposal vs integer UTC-TAIEd DaviesThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Tom Van BaakThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Telescope pointing and UTCSteve AllenThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Telescope pointing and UTCMarkus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: Leap seconds in the European 50.0 Hz power gridSteve AllenThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: Subtracting two UTC/time_t timestamps under POSIXMarkus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds in the European 50.0 Hz power gridMarkus KuhnThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds in the European 50.0 Hz power gridJohn CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] What problems do leap seconds *really* create?Clive D.W. FeatherThursday, 30 January 2003
History of IEEE P1003.1 POSIX timeut1-mail_at_ASTHE.COMThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds in the European 50.0 Hz power gridSteve AllenThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] History of IEEE P1003.1 POSIX timeJohn CowanThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: History of IEEE P1003.1 POSIX timeut1-mail_at_ASTHE.COMThursday, 30 January 2003
UTC referenceRob SeamanThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Telescope pointing and UTCSteve AllenThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: "names for points in time"ut1-mail_at_ASTHE.COMThursday, 30 January 2003
UTC, leap seconds, and the BIPM, IAU, ITU et.al.Neal McBurnettThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] "names for points in time"Ken PizziniThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Calabretta's 86400 s + epsilon day proposalMark CalabrettaThursday, 30 January 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Epsilon proposal vs integer UTC-TAIMark CalabrettaThursday, 30 January 2003
Forthcoming Meeting of ITU-R SRG Colloquium on UTC Time Scalematsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 11 February 2003
UTC vis a vis civil timeSteve AllenWednesday, 12 February 2003
Re: Forthcoming Meeting of ITU-R SRG Colloquium on UTC Time ScaleSteve AllenWednesday, 12 February 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Forthcoming Meeting of ITU-R SRG Colloquium on UTC Time Scalematsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milWednesday, 12 February 2003
NASA GMT vs UTCTom Van BaakSaturday, 15 February 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] NASA GMT vs UTCRob SeamanSunday, 16 February 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] NASA GMT vs UTCmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milSunday, 16 February 2003
Re: UTC, leap seconds, and the BIPM, IAU, ITU et.al.Steve AllenSunday, 16 February 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] NASA GMT vs UTCWilliam ThompsonThursday, 20 February 2003
civil time and VenezuelaSteve AllenFriday, 28 February 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time and VenezuelaEd DaviesFriday, 28 February 2003
IERS Surveymatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milThursday, 20 March 2003
Front-running Options for Redefinition of UTCmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milMonday, 24 March 2003
Re: Front-running Options for Redefinition of UTCSteve AllenWednesday, 26 March 2003
bibliographySteve AllenFriday, 28 March 2003
Call for Papers to UTC Time Scale Colloquiummatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 1 April 2003
Ground-based Optical and Infrared ObservatoriesSteve AllenTuesday, 1 April 2003
FW: Colloquium on the UTC Timescale, 28-29 May 2003, Turinmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milFriday, 4 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] bibliographyNeal McBurnettFriday, 4 April 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Fw: virus ??Seeds, GlenTuesday, 8 April 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Few:matsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILTuesday, 8 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fw: virus ??mattk_at_tpg.com.auTuesday, 8 April 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] Fw:Kevin J. RowettTuesday, 8 April 2003
Re: bibliographySteve AllenWednesday, 9 April 2003
legal timeSteve AllenThursday, 10 April 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] legal timeSeeds, GlenFriday, 11 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Colloquium on the UTC Timescale, 28-29 May 2003, TurinMarkus KuhnThursday, 17 April 2003
UTC is doomedSteve AllenTuesday, 22 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedEd DaviesWednesday, 23 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedMark CalabrettaWednesday, 23 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedSteve AllenThursday, 24 April 2003
Proposed use of DNS to Disseminate Leap Second InformationEd DaviesThursday, 24 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedEd DaviesThursday, 24 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedBrian GarrettThursday, 24 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposed use of DNS to Disseminate Leap Second InformationClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 25 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Freedom Time (offtopic)Markus KuhnFriday, 25 April 2003
disseminating earth orientationSteve AllenFriday, 25 April 2003
Re: disseminating earth orientationSteve AllenFriday, 25 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedJoseph S. MyersFriday, 25 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UTC is doomedSteve AllenMonday, 28 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposed use of DNS to Disseminate Leap Second InformationEd DaviesMonday, 28 April 2003
system design?Rob SeamanMonday, 28 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] system design?Joseph S. MyersMonday, 28 April 2003
Torino UTC Colloquium proceedingsSteve AllenMonday, 28 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Torino UTC Colloquium proceedingsMarkus KuhnMonday, 28 April 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] system design?matsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILMonday, 28 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] system design?Rob SeamanMonday, 28 April 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposed use of DNS to Disseminate Leap Second InformationSteve AllenSunday, 4 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposed use of DNS to Disseminate Leap SecondInformationEd DaviesTuesday, 6 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] A Proposal to Upgrade UTCEd DaviesTuesday, 6 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Proposed use of DNS to Disseminate Leap Second InformationClive D.W. FeatherTuesday, 6 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] A Proposal to Upgrade UTCSteve AllenTuesday, 6 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] A Proposal to Upgrade UTCGyrgy SzondyWednesday, 7 May 2003
UT and the IAUSteve AllenSaturday, 10 May 2003
will history repeat itself?Steve AllenSaturday, 10 May 2003
Re: WeltzeitMarkus KuhnSaturday, 10 May 2003
Galileo to the rescueSteve AllenMonday, 26 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Galileo to the rescueRob SeamanMonday, 26 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Galileo to the rescueMarkus KuhnTuesday, 27 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Galileo to the rescueTom Van BaakTuesday, 27 May 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Torino presentationNeal McBurnettTuesday, 27 May 2003
UTC meeting comments?Rob SeamanFriday, 30 May 2003
Some personal notes on the Torino meetingMarkus KuhnMonday, 2 June 2003
Re: Some personal notes on the Torino meetingSteve AllenMonday, 2 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Some personal notes on the Torino meetingMarkus KuhnTuesday, 3 June 2003
pedagogically barren?Steve AllenTuesday, 3 June 2003
[LEAPSECS] ADS-B, was: Some personal notes on the Torino meetingEd DaviesTuesday, 3 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Markus KuhnWednesday, 4 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?William ThompsonWednesday, 4 June 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Seeds, GlenWednesday, 4 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Peter BunclarkWednesday, 4 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?John CowanWednesday, 4 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Markus KuhnThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?William ThompsonThursday, 5 June 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Seeds, GlenThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?John CowanThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?John CowanThursday, 5 June 2003
ISO 8601Rob SeamanThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: Torino meeting and implications of international time >> UT1Markus KuhnThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: Torino meeting and implications of international time >> UT1Steve AllenThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Torino meeting and implications of international time >> UT1Rob SeamanThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Brian GarrettThursday, 5 June 2003
UT1 vs. UT2Steve AllenThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Tom Van BaakThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] pedagogically barren?Joseph S. MyersThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Torino meeting and implications of international time >> UT1Ken PizziniThursday, 5 June 2003
Re: timestamps on death certificatesMarkus KuhnFriday, 6 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 6 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesEd DaviesFriday, 6 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesSteve AllenFriday, 6 June 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesKevin J. RowettFriday, 6 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesBrian GarrettFriday, 6 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesRob SeamanFriday, 6 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesPeter BunclarkMonday, 9 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesMarkus KuhnMonday, 9 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] timestamps on death certificatesClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 9 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UK law on GMT vs UTC, was: timestamps on death certificatesEd DaviesMonday, 9 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] UK law on GMT vs UTCRob SeamanMonday, 9 June 2003
Nature, June 12 & ITU WRCSteve AllenMonday, 23 June 2003
Torino SRG resolutionMarkus KuhnMonday, 23 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Nature, June 12 & ITU WRCMarkus KuhnMonday, 23 June 2003
more media coverageSteve AllenThursday, 26 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageEd DaviesThursday, 26 June 2003
Pre-1972 UTC seconds and daysEd DaviesThursday, 26 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Pre-1972 UTC seconds and daysJoseph S. MyersThursday, 26 June 2003
Re: recent LOD behaviorNGSThursday, 26 June 2003
Re: Pre-1972 UTC seconds and daysSteve AllenThursday, 26 June 2003
the Guardian and Doctor WhoSteve AllenThursday, 26 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the Guardian and Doctor WhoPeter BunclarkThursday, 26 June 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Pre-1972 UTC seconds and daysEd DaviesFriday, 27 June 2003
[LISTSERV_at_ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL: Rejected posting to LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL]John CowanFriday, 27 June 2003
Re: Pre-1972 UTC seconds and daysSteve AllenSunday, 29 June 2003
efficient use of timeSteve AllenTuesday, 1 July 2003
What to do if International Time hits the International Date Line?Markus KuhnTuesday, 1 July 2003
Re: What to do if International Time hits the International Date Line?Markus KuhnTuesday, 1 July 2003
making leap hours workableSteve AllenWednesday, 2 July 2003
Re: making leap hours workableSteve AllenWednesday, 2 July 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableSeeds, GlenWednesday, 2 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableut1-mail_at_ASTHE.COMWednesday, 2 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableSteve AllenWednesday, 2 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableMarkus KuhnThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableEd DaviesThursday, 3 July 2003
Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar correctionsMarkus KuhnThursday, 3 July 2003
Leapmilliseconds are not a solutionMarkus KuhnThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableSteve AllenThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar correctionsSteve AllenThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar correctionsMarkus KuhnThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar correctionsSteve AllenThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar correctionsJoseph S. MyersThursday, 3 July 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableSeeds, GlenThursday, 3 July 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] making leap hours workableSeeds, GlenThursday, 3 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Is Julian Date a time or an Earth angle?Markus KuhnFriday, 4 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Bulletin C number 26Ed DaviesFriday, 4 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leapmilliseconds are not a solutionEd DaviesFriday, 4 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Is Julian Date a time or an Earth angle?Steve AllenSunday, 6 July 2003
Ruminations about what happens nextSteve AllenSunday, 6 July 2003
shoehorning ( TI - UT ) into 16 bitsSteve AllenSunday, 6 July 2003
Re: Ruminations about time broadcast data formatsMarkus KuhnMonday, 7 July 2003
Re: Ruminations about time broadcast data formatsSteve AllenTuesday, 8 July 2003
"Universial" Time, "Terrestrial" Time -- time for new terminology?Markus KuhnTuesday, 8 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] "Universial" Time,"Terrestrial" Time -- time for new terminology?Ed DaviesTuesday, 8 July 2003
Re: "Universial" Time, "Terrestrial" Time -- time for new terminology?Steve AllenTuesday, 8 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] "Universial" Time,"Terrestrial" Time -- time for new terminology?Deckers, MichaelWednesday, 9 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] "Universial" Time,"Terrestrial" Time -- time for new terminology?Joseph S. MyersWednesday, 9 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] "Universial" Time,"Terrestrial" Time -- time for newterminology?Deckers, MichaelThursday, 10 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageEd DaviesThursday, 10 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageRob SeamanThursday, 10 July 2003
the beauty and curse of leap secondsSteve AllenThursday, 10 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the beauty and curse of leap secondsJoseph S. MyersFriday, 11 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageEd DaviesFriday, 11 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageRob SeamanFriday, 11 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageSteve AllenFriday, 11 July 2003
Re: religious concernsMarkus KuhnSaturday, 12 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] religious concernsRob SeamanSaturday, 12 July 2003
Re: religious concernsSteve AllenSaturday, 12 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] religious concernsMarkus KuhnSunday, 13 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] religious concernsSteve AllenSunday, 13 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] religious concernsMarkus KuhnSunday, 13 July 2003
UTH againSteve AllenSunday, 13 July 2003
Re: UTH againMarkus KuhnMonday, 14 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] religious concernsJohn CowanMonday, 14 July 2003
Meridian Conference proceedings scannedJoseph S. MyersMonday, 14 July 2003
Re: Meridian Conference proceedings scannedSteve AllenMonday, 14 July 2003
DRM broadcast disrupted by leap secondsMarkus KuhnFriday, 18 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] DRM broadcast disrupted by leap secondsEd DaviesSaturday, 19 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] DRM broadcast disrupted by leap secondsMarkus KuhnSaturday, 19 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] DRM broadcast disrupted by leap secondsPeter BunclarkSunday, 20 July 2003
more media coverageSteve AllenTuesday, 22 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageClive D.W. FeatherTuesday, 22 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageBrian GarrettTuesday, 22 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coveragePeter BunclarkWednesday, 23 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageSteve AllenWednesday, 23 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageEd DaviesWednesday, 23 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageRob SeamanWednesday, 23 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageJohn CowanWednesday, 23 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageRob SeamanWednesday, 23 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more media coverageEd DaviesThursday, 24 July 2003
Re: Applications of earth-orientation informationMarkus KuhnThursday, 24 July 2003
Time-of-day inventory (was: more media...)Rob SeamanThursday, 24 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time-of-day inventory (was: more media...)John CowanThursday, 24 July 2003
when the media comes a knockingSteve AllenSunday, 27 July 2003
More media coverage: NZZ 2003-07-13Markus KuhnSaturday, 26 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] when the media comes a knockingJohn CowanMonday, 28 July 2003
ITU-R TF.460 past, present, and futureSteve AllenTuesday, 29 July 2003
calendrical concernsSteve AllenWednesday, 30 July 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU-R TF.460 past, present, and futureEd DaviesWednesday, 30 July 2003
German Time Act of 1978, now available in EnglishMarkus KuhnWednesday, 30 July 2003
a failure caused by lack of leap secondsSteve AllenFriday, 8 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] a failure caused by lack of leap secondsTom Van BaakSaturday, 9 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] a failure caused by lack of leap secondsEd DaviesSaturday, 9 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] preferred months for leap secondsMarkus KuhnSaturday, 9 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] a failure caused by lack of leap secondstrey valentaSaturday, 9 August 2003
Let's have more leap secondsEd DaviesMonday, 11 August 2003
mining for data about timeSteve AllenThursday, 14 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about timeNGSFriday, 15 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about timeMarkus KuhnFriday, 15 August 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about timeSeeds, GlenMonday, 18 August 2003
time lords again, in Australian mediaSteve AllenTuesday, 19 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about time - ReplyJtrulyfree_at_aol.comTuesday, 19 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] more fundamental solutionsMarkus KuhnTuesday, 19 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about time - ReplyJohn CowanTuesday, 19 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about time - ReplyPeter BunclarkTuesday, 19 August 2003
Obvious solutionsJohn CowanTuesday, 19 August 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] mining for data about time - ReplyRob SeamanTuesday, 19 August 2003
leap history and air trafficSteve AllenSaturday, 23 August 2003
the analemmaSteve AllenSaturday, 23 August 2003
More media coverage: Der Spiegel 2003-08-25Markus KuhnWednesday, 27 August 2003
what is the active standard?Steve AllenMonday, 1 September 2003
a prescriptive easement?Steve AllenWednesday, 3 September 2003
(no subject)Lee RottlerThursday, 4 September 2003
if you read GermanSteve AllenThursday, 11 September 2003
GeTSteve AllenSunday, 14 September 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] GeTBrian GarrettSunday, 14 September 2003
power grids and leap secondsSteve AllenTuesday, 30 September 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] power grids and leap secondsTom Van BaakTuesday, 30 September 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] power grids and leap secondsMarkus KuhnTuesday, 30 September 2003
Time Signal AdjustmentTom Van BaakWednesday, 1 October 2003
Wired magazineSteve AllenTuesday, 14 October 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wired magazineMarkus KuhnWednesday, 15 October 2003
Torino Meeting presentations and resolutionMarkus KuhnWednesday, 15 October 2003
FW: [IGSMAIL-4679]: upcoming UTC anomalymatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 4 November 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] FW: [IGSMAIL-4679]: upcoming UTC anomalyMartin BurnickiMonday, 10 November 2003
Motorola glitch in the newsSteve AllenMonday, 10 November 2003
Motorola GPS glitch detailsTom Van BaakFriday, 28 November 2003
the legacy of ephemeris timeSteve AllenSaturday, 6 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timePoul-Henning KampSunday, 7 December 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeSeeds, GlenMonday, 8 December 2003
New York Times MagazineSteve AllenSunday, 14 December 2003
Vanni Zerauschek/MAIN/MC1 is out of the office.Vanni.Zerauschek_at_marconiselenia.comMonday, 15 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeSteve AllenSunday, 21 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timejcowan_at_reutershealth.comMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeMarkus KuhnMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timejcowan_at_REUTERSHEALTH.COMMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeSteve AllenMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timePoul-Henning KampMonday, 22 December 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeSeeds, GlenMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeSteve AllenMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timePoul-Henning KampMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timejcowan_at_reutershealth.comMonday, 22 December 2003
RE: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timeSeeds, GlenMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timejcowan_at_reutershealth.comMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] the legacy of ephemeris timePoul-Henning KampMonday, 22 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeMarkus KuhnTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timejcowan_at_reutershealth.comTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeJtrulyfree_at_AOL.COMTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeSteve AllenTuesday, 23 December 2003
leap second arbitrageSteve AllenTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timejcowan_at_reutershealth.comTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeSteve AllenTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeTom Van BaakTuesday, 23 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeSteve AllenTuesday, 23 December 2003
GPS will failSteve AllenWednesday, 24 December 2003
Re: GPS will fail EVEN SOONERSteve AllenSaturday, 27 December 2003
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS will fail EVEN SOONERPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 27 December 2003
looks like MILSTAR fails along with GPSSteve AllenSunday, 28 December 2003
atomic clock historySteve AllenWednesday, 31 December 2003
CNN "story"Tom Van BaakThursday, 1 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading timeTom Van BaakThursday, 1 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS will fail EVEN SOONERTom Van BaakThursday, 1 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS will fail EVEN SOONERSteve AllenThursday, 1 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS will fail EVEN SOONERSteve AllenThursday, 1 January 2004
Discovery Channel articleTom Van BaakThursday, 1 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS will fail EVEN SOONER, notTom Van BaakFriday, 2 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] CNN "story" and more media coverageMarkus KuhnFriday, 2 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] that wretched AP article on leap secondsSteve AllenSaturday, 3 January 2004
Media coverageRob SeamanWednesday, 14 January 2004
Leap Seconds on Mars?Tom Van BaakThursday, 15 January 2004
Re: Leap Seconds on Mars?Steve AllenThursday, 15 January 2004
no leap in JuneSteve AllenFriday, 16 January 2004
name the equinox contest on nowSteve AllenWednesday, 28 January 2004
Re: name the equinox contest on nowMarkus KuhnThursday, 29 January 2004
RE: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowSeeds, GlenThursday, 29 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowSteve AllenThursday, 29 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowjcowan_at_reutershealth.comThursday, 29 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowSteve AllenThursday, 29 January 2004
RE: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowSeeds, GlenFriday, 30 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowjcowan_at_REUTERSHEALTH.COMFriday, 30 January 2004
RE: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowSeeds, GlenFriday, 30 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowSteve AllenFriday, 30 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] name the equinox contest on nowjcowan_at_REUTERSHEALTH.COMFriday, 30 January 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS versus GalileoMarkus KuhnThursday, 5 February 2004
Discover magazineSteve AllenFriday, 13 February 2004
Discover MagazineSteve AllenThursday, 12 February 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS versus GalileoSteve AllenSaturday, 14 February 2004
martian solar day confusionSteve AllenSaturday, 14 February 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS versus GalileoMarkus KuhnSunday, 15 February 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS versus GalileoSteve AllenSunday, 15 February 2004
ITU-R SRG7A Turin colloquium proceedings available onlineMarkus KuhnTuesday, 24 February 2004
Re: ITU-R SRG7A Turin colloquium proceedings available onlineSteve AllenTuesday, 24 February 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] GPS versus GalileoMarkus KuhnSunday, 29 February 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] Unifying Atomic Time and the post-Gregorian calendar correctionsSteve AllenTuesday, 9 March 2004
CCTF and the future of UTCSteve AllenMonday, 29 March 2004
recent CCTF meetingSteve AllenWednesday, 14 April 2004
precision time web searchSteve AllenWednesday, 5 May 2004
Re: [LEAPSECS] precision time web searchPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 5 May 2004
leaps and C language standardsSteve AllenMonday, 14 June 2004
ITU Meeting last yearmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milWednesday, 19 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearMarkus KuhnThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearJohn CowanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearJohn CowanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearMarkus KuhnThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearSteve AllenThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearPoul-Henning KampThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearTom Van BaakThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearSteve AllenThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] TAI-UT1 predictionMarkus KuhnThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearTom Van BaakThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearPoul-Henning KampThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearSteve AllenThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearPoul-Henning KampThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Meeting last yearJohn CowanThursday, 20 January 2005
two world clocksRob SeamanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksJohn CowanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksPoul-Henning KampThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksRob SeamanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksJohn CowanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksRob SeamanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksRob SeamanThursday, 20 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksPoul-Henning KampFriday, 21 January 2005
Apropos solar time...Poul-Henning KampFriday, 21 January 2005
RE: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksSeeds, GlenFriday, 21 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksPoul-Henning KampFriday, 21 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksJoseph S. MyersFriday, 21 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksJohn CowanFriday, 21 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksPoul-Henning KampFriday, 21 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksRob SeamanFriday, 21 January 2005
Time after TimeDaniel R. TobiasSaturday, 22 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimePoul-Henning KampSunday, 23 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimeMarkus KuhnSunday, 23 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimeJohn CowanSunday, 23 January 2005
Re: two world clocks AND Time after TimeSteve AllenSunday, 23 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimeTom Van BaakMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimeMarkus KuhnMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimeMarkus KuhnMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimeSteve AllenMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimePoul-Henning KampMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimeMarkus KuhnMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Time after TimePoul-Henning KampMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimePoul-Henning KampMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimeJohn CowanMonday, 24 January 2005
RE: [LEAPSECS] two world clocksSeeds, GlenMonday, 24 January 2005
The ends won't justify the meansRob SeamanMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: The ends won't justify the meansSteve AllenMonday, 24 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 25 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimeClive D.W. FeatherTuesday, 25 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 25 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] two world clocks AND Time after TimeSteve AllenTuesday, 25 January 2005
our customers' needsRob SeamanWednesday, 26 January 2005
Crustal reboundClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 26 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Crustal reboundPeter BunclarkWednesday, 26 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Crustal reboundSteve AllenThursday, 27 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Crustal reboundClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 27 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] our customers' needsClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 27 January 2005
The Eleven DaysJohn CowanThursday, 27 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] The Eleven DaysClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 27 January 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] The Eleven DaysJohn CowanThursday, 27 January 2005
leaps in jazz/rock fusionSteve AllenSunday, 6 February 2005
Asian earthquake effectsMark CalabrettaThursday, 10 February 2005
GMT -> UTC in AustraliaSteve AllenTuesday, 22 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in Australia and elsewhereMarkus KuhnWednesday, 23 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in Australia and elsewherePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 23 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaRob SeamanWednesday, 23 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaSteve AllenWednesday, 23 February 2005
Re: GMT -> UTC in AustraliaSteve AllenWednesday, 23 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaJohn CowanThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaRob SeamanThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaJohn CowanThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: GMT -> UTC in AustraliaSteve AllenThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaRob SeamanThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaTom Van BaakThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaJohn CowanThursday, 24 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 25 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaPoul-Henning KampFriday, 25 February 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] GMT -> UTC in AustraliaSteve AllenFriday, 25 February 2005
Re: "Secular"Markus KuhnFriday, 25 February 2005
two media links and an inferenceSteve AllenFriday, 25 March 2005
Leap second before 2007-12-31 ?Poul-Henning KampWednesday, 13 April 2005
interesting thing of the daySteve AllenFriday, 29 April 2005
Report from the 16th CCTF meetingSteve AllenWednesday, 4 May 2005
Bulletin C number 30 (fwd)Joseph S. MyersMonday, 4 July 2005
time-nutsSteve AllenWednesday, 6 July 2005
so sorry, MarkusSteve AllenThursday, 7 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] so sorry, MarkusBrian GarrettFriday, 8 July 2005
About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomyChristian SteyaertFriday, 8 July 2005
Re: About UTC / a disaster for classical astronomySteve AllenFriday, 8 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] so sorry, MarkusJohn.CowanFriday, 8 July 2005
Philippine opinion pieceSteve AllenThursday, 14 July 2005
it's all humorSteve AllenSunday, 17 July 2005
Wall Street Journal ArticleTom Van BaakFriday, 29 July 2005
Re: Wall Street Journal ArticleSteve AllenFriday, 29 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleJoe FitzgeraldFriday, 29 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleRob SeamanFriday, 29 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampSaturday, 30 July 2005
Leap-second scare storiesMarkus KuhnSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesJohn.CowanSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesMarkus KuhnSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 30 July 2005
Who uses DUT1?Tom Van BaakSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleRob SeamanSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesJohn.CowanSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesSteve AllenSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap-second scare storiesRob SeamanSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: Who uses DUT1?Steve AllenSaturday, 30 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleSteve AllenSunday, 31 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampSunday, 31 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleSteve AllenSunday, 31 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampSunday, 31 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleRob SeamanSunday, 31 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleRob SeamanSunday, 31 July 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleMarkus KuhnMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleMarkus KuhnMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleJohn.CowanMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleJohn.CowanMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] xntpd and adjtimex() handling of leap secondsMarkus KuhnMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] xntpd and adjtimex() handling of leap secondsPoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleRob SeamanMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleJohn.CowanMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticlePoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleSteve AllenMonday, 1 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wall Street Journal ArticleRob SeamanMonday, 1 August 2005
Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreTuesday, 2 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Ed DaviesWednesday, 3 August 2005
new beginningRob SeamanWednesday, 3 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreWednesday, 3 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreWednesday, 3 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampWednesday, 3 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningPoul-Henning KampThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningSteve AllenThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningPoul-Henning KampThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningEd DaviesThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningSteve AllenThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningDaniel R. TobiasThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?John.CowanThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningSteve AllenThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Steve AllenThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Scott MooreThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?John.CowanThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Mark CalabrettaThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningPeter BunclarkThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningPoul-Henning KampThursday, 4 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] new beginningClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Mark CalabrettaFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Markus KuhnFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC beepsMarkus KuhnFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Markus KuhnFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC beepsEd DaviesFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Markus KuhnFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber seconds & need for different timescales: was Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Ed DaviesFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber seconds & need for different timescales: was Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber seconds & need for different timescales: was Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Steve AllenFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber seconds & need for different timescales: was Stupid question from programmer: Why not just eliminate ALL UTC corrections ?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber secondsEd DaviesFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber secondsPoul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber secondsEd DaviesFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber seconds & need for different timescalesRob SeamanFriday, 5 August 2005
rubber timeRob SeamanFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Rubber secondsPoul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] rubber timeJohn.CowanFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] rubber timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] rubber timeSteve AllenFriday, 5 August 2005
Precise time over timeTom Van BaakFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanFriday, 5 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeSteve AllenTuesday, 9 August 2005
eBay official time (was Re: Precise time over time )Tim ShepardTuesday, 9 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 9 August 2005
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVRob SeamanTuesday, 9 August 2005
Martian ChroniclesPeter BunclarkWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Martian ChroniclesClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Martian ChroniclesRob SeamanWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Martian ChroniclesDaniel R. TobiasWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeMarkus KuhnWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVMark CalabrettaWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeJohn.CowanWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanWednesday, 10 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVPeter BunclarkThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeMarkus KuhnThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeSteve AllenThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeJohn.CowanThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePeter BunclarkThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeSteve AllenThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeSteve AllenThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeJohn.CowanThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeGreg HennessyThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeMark CalabrettaThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeBrian GarrettThursday, 11 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeGreg HennessyFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeEd DaviesFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeGreg HennessyFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeRob SeamanFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timePoul-Henning KampFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeGreg HennessyFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: a leap second on 31 Dec 2005, and no more leap seconds after thatChristian SteyaertFriday, 12 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precise time over timeJohn.CowanSaturday, 13 August 2005
decision tree for civil timeRob SeamanSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timePoul-Henning KampSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: decision tree for civil timeRob SeamanSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timePoul-Henning KampSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeWarner LoshSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeGreg HennessySaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeM. Warner LoshSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeRob SeamanSaturday, 13 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeRob SeamanSunday, 14 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeRob SeamanSunday, 14 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeEd DaviesSunday, 14 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Long term scheduling and bounding DUT1Ed DaviesSunday, 14 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] decision tree for civil timeRob SeamanSunday, 14 August 2005
Civil Time decision tree v0.5Rob SeamanSunday, 14 August 2005
Re: Civil Time decision tree v0.5Rob SeamanWednesday, 17 August 2005
Re: Civil Time decision tree v0.5Steve AllenWednesday, 17 August 2005
Reference for spacetime metric precisionJohn H. Seago (contractor)Wednesday, 17 August 2005
Re: Reference for spacetime metric precisionSteve AllenThursday, 18 August 2005
vive le BIH!Steve AllenThursday, 25 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] vive le BIH!John.CowanFriday, 26 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] vive le BIH!Clive D.W. FeatherMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] vive le BIH!John.CowanMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] vive le BIH!Poul-Henning KampMonday, 29 August 2005
Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanMonday, 29 August 2005
most recent newsSteve AllenMonday, 29 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePeter BunclarkTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePeter BunclarkTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseMark CalabrettaTuesday, 30 August 2005
Leap seconds BoFMark CalabrettaTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap seconds BoFPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 30 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseSteve AllenWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanWednesday, 31 August 2005
knowing what time it isTim ShepardWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisetrey valentaWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseEd DaviesWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseSteve AllenWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromisePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 31 August 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseEd DaviesThursday, 1 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseJohn.CowanThursday, 1 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseRob SeamanThursday, 1 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseMark CalabrettaThursday, 1 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Consensus rather than compromiseClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 5 September 2005
RAS hits the newsSteve AllenWednesday, 21 September 2005
Comments on Civil Time decision treeRob SeamanFriday, 23 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treePoul-Henning KampMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsJohn.CowanMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treePeter BunclarkMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsRob SeamanMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treePoul-Henning KampMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsTom Van BaakMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsPoul-Henning KampMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRob SeamanMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsTom Van BaakMonday, 26 September 2005
RE: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsHornaday, Tem SPAWARMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeDaniel R. TobiasMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsTom Van BaakMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRandy KaelberMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treePoul-Henning KampMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsEd DaviesMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRob SeamanMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsTom Van BaakMonday, 26 September 2005
RE: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsHornaday, Tem SPAWARMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsEd DaviesMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treePoul-Henning KampMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRandy KaelberMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsTom Van BaakMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treePoul-Henning KampMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRandy KaelberMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeJohn.CowanMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsSteve AllenMonday, 26 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] RAS hits the newsPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 27 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeWilliam ThompsonTuesday, 27 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeWilliam ThompsonTuesday, 27 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRandy KaelberTuesday, 27 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeWilliam ThompsonTuesday, 27 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeRob SeamanTuesday, 27 September 2005
BBC on-line articleEd DaviesWednesday, 28 September 2005
response from GermanySteve AllenWednesday, 28 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comments on Civil Time decision treeWilliam ThompsonWednesday, 28 September 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] response from GermanyFrancois MeyerFriday, 30 September 2005
The Trouble with POSIXPeter BunclarkFriday, 30 September 2005
was it because of Asimov?Steve AllenSunday, 2 October 2005
curiouser and curiouserSteve AllenWednesday, 5 October 2005
ABC leapsec articleMark CalabrettaTuesday, 11 October 2005
Mary Baker Eddy joins inSteve AllenWednesday, 12 October 2005
The Long NowRob SeamanThursday, 13 October 2005
What next?Rob SeamanWednesday, 26 October 2005
POSIX in the crosshairs?Steve AllenSunday, 30 October 2005
To listadmin: No mails arriving here anymoreMartin BurnickiMonday, 31 October 2005
US proposal to abolish leap seconds - Not FoundNeal McBurnettTuesday, 8 November 2005
Re: US proposal to abolish leap seconds - Not FoundSteve AllenTuesday, 8 November 2005
leapsecs list still not getting to everyoneNeal McBurnettTuesday, 8 November 2005
The Truth is Out ThereSteve AllenTuesday, 8 November 2005
Be thankful for John FlamsteadEd DaviesThursday, 10 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Be thankful for John FlamsteadRob SeamanThursday, 10 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Be thankful for John FlamsteadRob SeamanThursday, 10 November 2005
Re: Be thankful for John FlamsteadSteve AllenThursday, 10 November 2005
FW: [LEAPSECS] ABC leapsec articlematsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milThursday, 10 November 2005
BBC 2 Newsnight videoSteve AllenFriday, 11 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ABC leapsec articleTom Van BaakSaturday, 12 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ABC leapsec articleSteve AllenSunday, 13 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] ABC leapsec articleRandy KaelberMonday, 14 November 2005
BBC - Leap second talks are postponedTom Van BaakTuesday, 15 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedBrian GarrettTuesday, 15 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedEd DaviesWednesday, 16 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedJohn.CowanWednesday, 16 November 2005
WP7A press releaseRob SeamanWednesday, 16 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 17 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedRob SeamanThursday, 17 November 2005
Google news alerts condemn the ITUSteve AllenThursday, 17 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedDavid HarperFriday, 18 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedEd DaviesFriday, 18 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] WP7A press releasePoul-Henning KampFriday, 18 November 2005
International Conference on Civil Timekeeping (was Re: [LEAPSECS] WP7A press release)Rob SeamanFriday, 18 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedPeter BunclarkFriday, 18 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] International Conference on Civil Timekeeping (was Re: [LEAPSECS] WP7A press release)Poul-Henning KampFriday, 18 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedPoul-Henning KampFriday, 18 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedPoul-Henning KampMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedPoul-Henning KampMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedRob SeamanMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedPoul-Henning KampMonday, 21 November 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] BBC - Leap second talks are postponedBrian GarrettMonday, 21 November 2005
SymmetricomPeter BunclarkThursday, 1 December 2005
a system that fails spectacularlySteve AllenTuesday, 6 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyFrancois MeyerWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyEd DaviesWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyRob SeamanWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyDavid HarperWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyMarkus KuhnWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlySteve AllenWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlySteve AllenWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyRob SeamanWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyWilliam ThompsonWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyBrian GarrettWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyConrad PoelmanWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyRob SeamanWednesday, 7 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyDavid HarperThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyRandy KaelberThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyRob SeamanThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyPoul-Henning KampThursday, 8 December 2005
RE: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyHornaday, Tem SPAWARThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyJohn.CowanThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyEd DaviesThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyJohn.CowanThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyMark CalabrettaThursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 9 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 9 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyDavid HarperFriday, 9 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyPeter BunclarkFriday, 9 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyDaniel R. TobiasFriday, 9 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] a system that fails spectacularlyRob SeamanTuesday, 13 December 2005
Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Ed DaviesFriday, 16 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Poul-Henning KampFriday, 16 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Markus KuhnSunday, 18 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Poul-Henning KampMonday, 19 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Rob SeamanMonday, 19 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Clive D.W. FeatherMonday, 19 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill [HL]Randy KaelberMonday, 19 December 2005
Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZMarkus KuhnMonday, 19 December 2005
Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecRob SeamanTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecRob SeamanTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecFrancois MeyerTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecTom Van BaakTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecTom Van BaakTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecRob SeamanTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecSteve AllenTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecFrancois MeyerTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecTom Van BaakTuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecBrian GarrettWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecFrancois MeyerWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Schreiver AFB warns about leapsecPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 21 December 2005
The only solid argument for leapseconds :-)Poul-Henning KampWednesday, 21 December 2005
Software requirementsRob SeamanWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZRandy KaelberWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZDavid HarperWednesday, 21 December 2005
Leap seconds past and future.Dennis O'KeefeWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsEd DaviesWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsRob SeamanWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZNeal McBurnettWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsRob SeamanWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsPeter BunclarkWednesday, 21 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] The only solid argument for leapseconds :-)Pete FormanThursday, 22 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsDaniel R. TobiasThursday, 22 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsEd DaviesThursday, 22 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsPoul-Henning KampThursday, 22 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Software requirementsPoul-Henning KampThursday, 22 December 2005
the principals speakSteve AllenSunday, 25 December 2005
I hope the Onion does even betterSteve AllenSunday, 25 December 2005
Leap Second Countdown ClockTom Van BaakTuesday, 27 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap Second Countdown ClockBrian GarrettTuesday, 27 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZNeal McBurnettFriday, 30 December 2005
Leap seconds anti-democratic? (Humor)Brian GarrettSaturday, 31 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZMarkus KuhnSaturday, 31 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Things to do at about 2005-12-31 23:59:60ZMarkus KuhnSaturday, 31 December 2005
leap seconds and Linux/Unix, timezones, and zdumpNeal McBurnettSaturday, 31 December 2005
went pretty dang smoothly at this endRob SeamanSaturday, 31 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap Second Countdown ClockBreen MullinsSaturday, 31 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] Leap Second Countdown ClockRob SeamanSaturday, 31 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] went pretty dang smoothly at this endKeith WinsteinSaturday, 31 December 2005
Re: [LEAPSECS] went pretty dang smoothly at this endSteve AllenSaturday, 31 December 2005
text book example why Leapseconds are badPoul-Henning KampSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] went pretty dang smoothly at this endKeith WinsteinSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] went pretty dang smoothly at this endDavid HarperSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] December 2005 leap second on MSF, Rugby, EnglandMarkus KuhnSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] December 2005 leap second on MSF, Rugby, EnglandDavid MaloneSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] went pretty dang smoothly at this endEd DaviesSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] December 2005 leap second on MSF, Rugby, EnglandJoseph S. MyersSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] December 2005 leap second on MSF, Rugby, EnglandM. Warner LoshSunday, 1 January 2006
Leap Second in GPS Receiver NMEA LogRichard LangleySunday, 1 January 2006
CDMA glitches, and TAI over NTPNeal McBurnettSunday, 1 January 2006
TAI, NTP and IETF; IEEE 1588Neal McBurnettSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] went pretty dang smoothly at this endTim ShepardSunday, 1 January 2006
NTP behavior in AustraliaSteve AllenSunday, 1 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NTP behavior in AustraliaPoul-Henning KampMonday, 2 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NTP behavior in AustraliaDavid MaloneMonday, 2 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] text book example why Leapseconds are badGreg HennessyMonday, 2 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] text book example why Leapseconds are badPeter BunclarkMonday, 2 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] text book example why Leapseconds are badM. Warner LoshTuesday, 3 January 2006
Where the responsibility lies (was Re: [LEAPSECS] text book example...)Rob SeamanTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] text book example why Leapseconds are badRandy KaelberTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: Where the responsibility liesRob SeamanTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Where the responsibility liesPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Where the responsibility liesRob SeamanTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice, was: Where the responsibility liesEd DaviesTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice, was: Where the responsibility liesPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice, was: Where the responsibility liesRob SeamanTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Where the responsibility liesNeal McBurnettTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice, was: Where the responsibility liesWarner LoshTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Where the responsibility liesPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Where the responsibility liesSteve AllenTuesday, 3 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] text book example why Leapseconds are badPeter BunclarkTuesday, 3 January 2006
Diagram of CHU Leap-Second Recording and "Atomic" ClockRichard LangleyWednesday, 4 January 2006
Fwd: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeRob SeamanWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeM. Warner LoshWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeRob SeamanWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Diagram of CHU Leap-Second Recording and "Atomic" ClockTom Van BaakWednesday, 4 January 2006
ITU Request for Leap Second ExperiencesEd MirmakWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticecowan_at_ccil.orgWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Diagram of CHU Leap-Second Recording and "Atomic" ClockPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Diagram of CHU Leap-Second Recording and "Atomic" ClockTom Van BaakWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeTom Van BaakWednesday, 4 January 2006
Double 59; 60; or double 00?Tom Van BaakWednesday, 4 January 2006
25 o'clock, we'll be together 'til the end of time (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Rob SeamanWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Diagram of CHU Leap-Second Recording and "Atomic" ClockPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeEd DaviesWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: Double 59; 60; or double 00?M. Warner LoshWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeJohn CowanWednesday, 4 January 2006
civil time = solar timeRob SeamanWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timeJohn CowanWednesday, 4 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timeSteve AllenThursday, 5 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timeEd DaviesThursday, 5 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timeRob SeamanThursday, 5 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timeClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 5 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 5 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] civil time = solar timeWilliam ThompsonThursday, 5 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second noticeJohn CowanFriday, 6 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ITU Request for Leap Second ExperiencesNeal McBurnettFriday, 6 January 2006
DCF77 leapsecond documentedPoul-Henning KampFriday, 6 January 2006
Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Rob SeamanFriday, 6 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Poul-Henning KampFriday, 6 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)William ThompsonFriday, 6 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Steve AllenFriday, 6 January 2006
The real problem with leap secondsMichael SokolovFriday, 6 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Poul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Poul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Defining our terms (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Longer leap second notice)Poul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
HBG transmitted wrong info during leapsecondPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] HBG transmitted wrong info during leapsecondMarkus KuhnSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] HBG transmitted wrong info during leapsecondPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesSaturday, 7 January 2006
leap seconds are evil, no reallySteve AllenSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsRob SeamanSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenSaturday, 7 January 2006
The opportunity of leap secondsRob SeamanSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsJohn CowanSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsJohn CowanSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsJohn CowanSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsJohn CowanSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsNeal McBurnettSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsDaniel R. TobiasSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsM. Warner LoshSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsRob SeamanSaturday, 7 January 2006
predicting leap seconds (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Where the responsibility lies)Neal McBurnettSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: The real problem with leap secondsMichael SokolovSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: The real problem with leap secondsMichael SokolovSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: The real problem with leap secondsMichael SokolovSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael SokolovSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael SokolovSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: predicting leap secondsM. Warner LoshSaturday, 7 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPeter BunclarkSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsSteve AllenSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPeter BunclarkSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] predicting leap secondsRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
interoperabilityRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsM. Warner LoshSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsTom Van BaakSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsTom Van BaakSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityTom Van BaakSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityDaniel R. TobiasSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityTom Van BaakSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityJohn CowanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityJohn CowanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityJohn CowanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityPoul-Henning KampSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityM. Warner LoshSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityPeter BunclarkSunday, 8 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap secondsPeter BunclarkMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilitySteve AllenMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityPoul-Henning KampMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPeter BunclarkMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampMonday, 9 January 2006
Metas confirms HBG did failPoul-Henning KampMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsM. Warner LoshMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityRob SeamanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilityJohn CowanMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] interoperabilitySteve AllenMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMarkus KuhnMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsWarner LoshMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsTim ShepardMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPeter BunclarkMonday, 9 January 2006
Re: MJD and leap secondsTom Van BaakTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsPeter BunclarkTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsTom Van BaakTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsPeter BunclarkTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsRob SeamanTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] MJD and leap secondsRob SeamanTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPeter BunclarkTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsTim ShepardTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsJohn CowanTuesday, 10 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsDavid MaloneWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsDaniel R. TobiasWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenWednesday, 11 January 2006
War of the WorldsRob SeamanWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsM. Warner LoshWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] War of the WorldsJohn CowanWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaWednesday, 11 January 2006
Monsters from the idRob SeamanWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] War of the WorldsNeal McBurnettWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] War of the WorldsNeal McBurnettWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] War of the WorldsJohn CowanWednesday, 11 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idMichael DeckersThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsDavid MaloneThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idMark CalabrettaThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idRob SeamanThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idRob SeamanThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanThursday, 12 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idEd DaviesFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesFriday, 13 January 2006
Report of Leap Second Problem with GPS DataRichard LangleyFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMarkus KuhnFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersFriday, 13 January 2006
Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearRichard LangleyFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesFriday, 13 January 2006
Analog clocks and leap secondsTom Van BaakFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsRob SeamanFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idRob SeamanFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsRob SeamanFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsTim ShepardFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: Analog clocks and leap secondsJohn HawkinsonFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsWarner LoshFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsWilliam ThompsonFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idTom Van BaakFriday, 13 January 2006
Time standards: RFC3339 and ISO 8601, NTPNeal McBurnettFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanFriday, 13 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idRob SeamanSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Report of Leap Second Problem with GPS DataRob SeamanSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Report of Leap Second Problem with GPS DataPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Report of Leap Second Problem with GPS DataM. Warner LoshSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearRob SeamanSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearRichard LangleySaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Report of Leap Second Problem with GPS DataRob SeamanSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearJohn CowanSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Report of Leap Second Problem with GPS DataPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearRob SeamanSaturday, 14 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearRob SeamanSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearJohn CowanSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Analog clocks and leap secondsMark CalabrettaSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idMark CalabrettaSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanSunday, 15 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsSteve AllenMonday, 16 January 2006
Risks of change to UTCRob SeamanMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsWarner LoshMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idRob SeamanMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanMonday, 16 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 17 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New YearSteve AllenTuesday, 17 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idMark CalabrettaTuesday, 17 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idNeal McBurnettTuesday, 17 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsFrancois MeyerWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsEd DaviesWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsM. Warner LoshWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMichael DeckersWednesday, 18 January 2006
Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaWednesday, 18 January 2006
Indiana time zone change from Department of TransportationNeal McBurnettWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsM. Warner LoshWednesday, 18 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSPoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSEd DaviesThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSPoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Fixing POSIX timeNeal McBurnettThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSRob SeamanThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: Fixing POSIX timeM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSRob SeamanThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsDeckers, MichaelThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fixing POSIX timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fixing POSIX timePoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSPoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
the GPS impending leap second bitSteve AllenThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fixing POSIX timeMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSPoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: the GPS impending leap second bitM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: Fixing POSIX timeSteve AllenThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fixing POSIX timeM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSTim ShepardThursday, 19 January 2006
McCarthy point (was: Fixing POSIX time)Markus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fixing POSIX timeSteve AllenThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSPoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSMarkus KuhnThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] McCarthy point (was: Fixing POSIX time)Poul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSM. Warner LoshThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSEd DaviesThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSRob SeamanThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap secondsMark CalabrettaThursday, 19 January 2006
The parade of the leap secondJames MaynardThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Internet-Draft on UTC-SLSPoul-Henning KampThursday, 19 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Fixing POSIX timeClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJohn CowanFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCNeal McBurnettFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJames MaynardFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJohn CowanFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJames MaynardFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJohn CowanFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Monsters from the idJohn CowanFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJames MaynardFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJames MaynardFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCBrian GarrettFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshFriday, 20 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJames MaynardSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCDaniel R. TobiasSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCRob SeamanSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCRob SeamanSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCDaniel R. TobiasSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCRob SeamanSaturday, 21 January 2006
distribute TAI as well (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTC )Tim ShepardSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] distribute TAI as well (was Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTC )Neal McBurnettSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJohn CowanSaturday, 21 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJohn CowanSaturday, 21 January 2006
A cruel fraud!James MaynardSaturday, 21 January 2006
the tail wags the dogSteve AllenSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: NOT A cruel fraud!M. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!Ed DaviesSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!Ed DaviesSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCMarkus KuhnSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!M. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!M. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!Peter BunclarkSunday, 22 January 2006
Approach to leap second discussionEd DaviesSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: the tail wags the dogMichael SokolovSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!James MaynardSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCMichael SokolovSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogNero ImhardSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Approach to leap second discussionRob SeamanSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Approach to leap second discussionEd DaviesSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCMark CalabrettaSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCMark CalabrettaSunday, 22 January 2006
A modest proposalJames MaynardSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!M. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] NOT A cruel fraud!M. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: the tail wags the dogM. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCM. Warner LoshSunday, 22 January 2006
wikipedia "Leap Seconds" collaborationNeal McBurnettSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Approach to leap second discussionFrancois MeyerSunday, 22 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCDavid MaloneMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCSteve AllenMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogRichard LangleyMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogSteve AllenMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTCJohn CowanMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: wikipedia "Leap Seconds" collaborationM. Warner LoshMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: wikipedia "Leap Seconds" collaborationTim ShepardMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogM. Warner LoshMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: wikipedia "Leap Seconds" collaborationNeal McBurnettMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] wikipedia "Leap Seconds" collaborationMarkus KuhnMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogRob SeamanMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogSteve AllenMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogJohn CowanMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogPeter BunclarkMonday, 23 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogRob SeamanTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogJames MaynardTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogEd DaviesTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogRob SeamanTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogRob SeamanTuesday, 24 January 2006
Accommodating both campsJames MaynardTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsJohn CowanTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsJames MaynardTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogEd DaviesTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsEd DaviesTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: Accommodating both campsWarner LoshTuesday, 24 January 2006
worthy challengesRob SeamanTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the tail wags the dogRob SeamanTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsMark CalabrettaTuesday, 24 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsMichael DeckersWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsSteve AllenWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsMichael DeckersWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsWarner LoshWednesday, 25 January 2006
The nature of riskRob SeamanWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: The nature of riskWarner LoshWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The nature of riskRob SeamanWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsJohn CowanWednesday, 25 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsMark CalabrettaThursday, 26 January 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Accommodating both campsMark CalabrettaThursday, 26 January 2006
Compariing Time Scales (was: Accommodating Both Camps)James MaynardThursday, 2 February 2006
Comparing time scales (second try!)James MaynardThursday, 2 February 2006
Re: Comparing time scales (second try!)Steve AllenThursday, 2 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing time scales (second try!)James MaynardThursday, 2 February 2006
marketing the leap secondSteve AllenThursday, 2 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing time scales (second try!)James MaynardThursday, 2 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] marketing the leap secondClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesJames MaynardFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesWarner LoshFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesJames MaynardFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesDaniel R. TobiasFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing time scalesJames MaynardFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesWarner LoshFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesWarner LoshFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesM. Warner LoshFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesJames MaynardFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesM. Warner LoshFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesM. Warner LoshSaturday, 4 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesTim ShepardSaturday, 4 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesM. Warner LoshFriday, 3 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesJohn CowanSaturday, 4 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS]Comparing Time ScalesTim ShepardSaturday, 4 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesRob SeamanSaturday, 4 February 2006
[IGSSTATION-805]: 1 Sec Epoch Error for GOPE and THU2 (fwd)Richard LangleySaturday, 4 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Comparing Time ScalesPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 4 February 2006
An immodest proposalRob SeamanMonday, 6 February 2006
Re: An immodest proposalRob SeamanTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalNeal McBurnettTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalJohn CowanTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalMarkus KuhnTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalRob SeamanTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalM. Warner LoshTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalM. Warner LoshTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalNeal McBurnettTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalM. Warner LoshTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] An immodest proposalRob SeamanTuesday, 14 February 2006
Re: Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondMarkus KuhnThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondSteve AllenThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondWarner LoshThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: 24:00 versus 00:00Markus KuhnThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondRob SeamanThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondMarkus KuhnThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00Ed DaviesThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00John CowanThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: 24:00 versus 00:00Warner LoshThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondRob SeamanThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondWarner LoshThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Ambiguous NTP timestamps near leap secondRob SeamanThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00Clive D.W. FeatherThursday, 16 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00Ed DaviesFriday, 17 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00John CowanFriday, 17 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00John CowanFriday, 17 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00Rob SeamanFriday, 17 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00Markus KuhnFriday, 17 February 2006
1884 IMC onlineSteve AllenSunday, 19 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 1884 IMC onlineRob SeamanMonday, 20 February 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 24:00 versus 00:00Rob SeamanMonday, 27 February 2006
ideas for new UTC rulesSteve AllenThursday, 13 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesPoul-Henning KampFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesRob SeamanFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesSteve AllenFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesM. Warner LoshFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesPoul-Henning KampFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesPoul-Henning KampFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesSteve AllenFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesRob SeamanFriday, 14 April 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ideas for new UTC rulesTim ShepardSaturday, 15 April 2006
dysfunction or dereliction?Steve AllenFriday, 28 April 2006
extracting leap second scheduleZeframWednesday, 24 May 2006
Precision vs. resolutionJohn CowanWednesday, 24 May 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] extracting leap second scheduleRob SeamanTuesday, 30 May 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precision vs. resolutionRob SeamanTuesday, 30 May 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precision vs. resolutionTom Van BaakTuesday, 30 May 2006
building consensusZeframThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusTom Van BaakThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusSteve AllenThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusSteve AllenThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusM. Warner LoshThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusM. Warner LoshThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusM. Warner LoshThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precision vs. resolutionJohn CowanThursday, 1 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precision vs. resolutionTom Van BaakThursday, 1 June 2006
RE: [LEAPSECS] building consensusmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milFriday, 2 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusPeter BunclarkFriday, 2 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Precision vs. resolutionMarkus KuhnSaturday, 3 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframSunday, 4 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanSunday, 4 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusM. Warner LoshSunday, 4 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanSunday, 4 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusM. Warner LoshMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusWarner LoshMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusWarner LoshMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusMark CalabrettaMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusMark CalabrettaMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusMichael SokolovMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
ISO 8601 and the Gregorian calendarJames MaynardMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusMark CalabrettaMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanMonday, 5 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusEd DaviesTuesday, 6 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframTuesday, 6 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanTuesday, 6 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusM. Warner LoshTuesday, 6 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusEd DaviesWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusDavid MaloneWednesday, 7 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusPeter BunclarkThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusPeter BunclarkThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusPeter BunclarkThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusGreg HennessyThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusZeframThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusPoul-Henning KampThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusDavid MaloneThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusRob SeamanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusJohn CowanThursday, 8 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] building consensusMark CalabrettaTuesday, 13 June 2006
leap seconds in artSteve AllenFriday, 23 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap seconds in artJoe FitzgeraldFriday, 23 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap seconds in artRob SeamanFriday, 23 June 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap seconds in artPeter BunclarkSaturday, 24 June 2006
independence daySteve AllenTuesday, 4 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 4 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayM. Warner LoshTuesday, 4 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 4 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayRob SeamanWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayJohn CowanWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayEd DaviesWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayMarkus KuhnWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayJohn CowanWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayMichael SokolovWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayRob SeamanWednesday, 5 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] independence dayJohn CowanWednesday, 5 July 2006
PT Barnum was rightSteve AllenThursday, 6 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was rightRob SeamanThursday, 6 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was rightJohn CowanThursday, 6 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was rightPoul-Henning KampThursday, 6 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was rightBrian GarrettThursday, 6 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was rightRob SeamanThursday, 6 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] PT Barnum was rightMark CalabrettaThursday, 6 July 2006
the case for created timeRob SeamanTuesday, 18 July 2006
Per Erik Kvam is out of the office.Per Erik KvamTuesday, 18 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] the case for created timeClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 19 July 2006
leap seconds in video artSteve AllenMonday, 31 July 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap seconds in video artBrian GarrettTuesday, 1 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] leap seconds in video artSteve AllenWednesday, 2 August 2006
trading amplitude for scheduling (was Re: [LEAPSECS] leap seconds in video art)Rob SeamanThursday, 3 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingTom Van BaakThursday, 3 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingJohn CowanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingJohn CowanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingJohn CowanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingTom Van BaakFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingJohn CowanFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] trading amplitude for schedulingTom Van BaakFriday, 4 August 2006
Re: trading amplitude for schedulingRob SeamanSaturday, 5 August 2006
catching up, AAS and US SenateSteve AllenTuesday, 12 September 2006
Re: catching up, AAS and US SenateSteve AllenWednesday, 13 September 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] catching up, AAS and US SenatePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 13 September 2006
IERS bull D # 94Steve AllenWednesday, 4 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] IERS bull D # 94Brian GarrettWednesday, 4 October 2006
Titan TimePeter BunclarkThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Titan TimeJohn CowanThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Titan TimeRob SeamanThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Titan TimeZeframThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Titan TimeRob SeamanThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Titan TimeZeframThursday, 26 October 2006
2006 WP-7A meeting summarymatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Titan TimeClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: 2006 WP-7A meeting summarySteve AllenThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 2006 WP-7A meeting summaryDaniel R. TobiasThursday, 26 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] 2006 WP-7A meeting summaryMichael SokolovThursday, 26 October 2006
transcribing the MS stuffSteve AllenThursday, 26 October 2006
ADASS poster on UTCSteve AllenFriday, 27 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ADASS poster on UTCJohn CowanSaturday, 28 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ADASS poster on UTCEd DaviesSaturday, 28 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ADASS poster on UTCDaniel R. TobiasSaturday, 28 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ADASS poster on UTCBrian GarrettSaturday, 28 October 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] ADASS poster on UTCSteve AllenSaturday, 28 October 2006
Shuttle brought forwardPeter BunclarkThursday, 9 November 2006
The fine printRob SeamanWednesday, 29 November 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The fine printJohn CowanWednesday, 29 November 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] The fine printBrian GarrettWednesday, 29 November 2006
Harper'sSteve AllenWednesday, 29 November 2006
how posterity will measure timeSteve AllenSunday, 3 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timeZeframMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timePoul-Henning KampMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timeRob SeamanMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timeRob SeamanMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timePoul-Henning KampMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timeEd DaviesMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timeZeframMonday, 4 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] how posterity will measure timeRob SeamanMonday, 4 December 2006
what time is it, legally?Steve AllenMonday, 11 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Richard B. LangleyTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Rob SeamanTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?ZeframTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Rob SeamanTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Poul-Henning KampTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Rob SeamanTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?ZeframTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?M. Warner LoshTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Tom Van BaakTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Magnus DanielsonTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Rob SeamanTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Rob SeamanTuesday, 12 December 2006
RE: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?matsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 12 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Ed DaviesWednesday, 13 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Peter BunclarkWednesday, 13 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Magnus DanielsonWednesday, 13 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Rob SeamanWednesday, 13 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Steve AllenWednesday, 13 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Daniel R. TobiasThursday, 14 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Richard B. LangleyThursday, 14 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Steve AllenThursday, 14 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Brian GarrettThursday, 14 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?Poul-Henning KampFriday, 15 December 2006
Equitable estoppelRob SeamanSunday, 17 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelPoul-Henning KampSunday, 17 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelSteve AllenSunday, 17 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelM. Warner LoshSunday, 17 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelPoul-Henning KampSunday, 17 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelMagnus DanielsonMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: Equitable estoppelPeter VinceMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelJohn E HeinMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelMagnus DanielsonMonday, 18 December 2006
RE: [LEAPSECS] listserve restoredmatsakis.demetrios_at_USNO.NAVY.MILMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelM. Warner LoshMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelSteve AllenMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelTom Van BaakMonday, 18 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Equitable estoppelRob SeamanTuesday, 19 December 2006
Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleySunday, 24 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshSunday, 24 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyKeith WinsteinSunday, 24 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyEd DaviesMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyKeith WinsteinMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallySteve AllenMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyMonday, 25 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallySteve AllenTuesday, 26 December 2006
Hippocratic humoursSteve AllenTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: Hippocratic humoursMichael SokolovTuesday, 26 December 2006
calendrical precedentSteve AllenTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyEd DaviesTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshTuesday, 26 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyZeframWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyAshley YakeleyWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanWednesday, 27 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyDaniel R. TobiasWednesday, 27 December 2006
Design - a Tufte decisionRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyPoul-Henning KampThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: Design - a Tufte decisionM. Warner LoshThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallySteve AllenThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyPoul-Henning KampThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyM. Warner LoshThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallySteve AllenThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyTony FinchThursday, 28 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallySteve AllenFriday, 29 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallySteve AllenFriday, 29 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyClive D.W. FeatherFriday, 29 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyRob SeamanFriday, 29 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyPete FormanFriday, 29 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyJohn CowanFriday, 29 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] Mechanism to provide tai-utc.dat locallyMichael DeckersFriday, 29 December 2006
RFC 2445 and unplanned pregnanciesSteve AllenFriday, 29 December 2006
A lurker surfacesJim PalfreymanSaturday, 30 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesRob SeamanSaturday, 30 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 30 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesJohn CowanSaturday, 30 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshSaturday, 30 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesEd DaviesSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesSteve AllenSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesTony FinchSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesZeframSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesJohn CowanSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesRob SeamanSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshSunday, 31 December 2006
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesPoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyMonday, 1 January 2007
Happy New Year!Rob SeamanMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingEd DaviesMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingMagnus DanielsonMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingEd DaviesMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingEd DaviesMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingGreg HennessyMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesMichael SokolovMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesJohn CowanMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesMagnus DanielsonMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesJohn CowanMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesSteve AllenMonday, 1 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesZeframTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesEd DaviesTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesJohn CowanTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingEd DaviesTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingWarner LoshTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingJohn CowanTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesZeframTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesWarner LoshTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingWarner LoshTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingJohn CowanTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesTony FinchTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingEd DaviesTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesZeframTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesPoul-Henning KampTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingJames MaynardTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyTuesday, 2 January 2007
Wikipedia articleEd DaviesTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesMagnus DanielsonTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesAshley YakeleyTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wikipedia articleZeframTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesMagnus DanielsonTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesDaniel R. TobiasTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingDaniel R. TobiasTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesDaniel R. TobiasTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesDaniel R. TobiasTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesRob SeamanTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wikipedia articleBrian GarrettTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesM. Warner LoshTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesMagnus DanielsonTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesSteve AllenTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesMagnus DanielsonTuesday, 2 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesZeframWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesZeframWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wikipedia articleZeframWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Wikipedia articleClive D.W. FeatherWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPeter BunclarkWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPeter BunclarkWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingMagnus DanielsonWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesTony FinchWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfacesTony FinchWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingMagnus DanielsonWednesday, 3 January 2007
how to reset a clockTony FinchWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] how to reset a clockZeframWednesday, 3 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingMichael DeckersThursday, 4 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] how to reset a clockTony FinchThursday, 4 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] how to reset a clockPeter BunclarkThursday, 4 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] how to reset a clockDaniel R. TobiasThursday, 4 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] how to reset a clockRob SeamanThursday, 4 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] how to reset a clockJohn CowanThursday, 4 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchFriday, 5 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 5 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenFriday, 5 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleyFriday, 5 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanFriday, 5 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleySaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleySaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleySaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleySaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingGreg HennessySaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleySaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingJohn CowanSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSaturday, 6 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingDavid MaloneSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingDaniel R. TobiasSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframSunday, 7 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingClive D.W. FeatherMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPeter BunclarkMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPoul-Henning KampMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingM. Warner LoshMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: Introduction of long term schedulingAshley YakeleyMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingMagnus DanielsonMonday, 8 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingZeframTuesday, 9 January 2007
RE: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milTuesday, 9 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingRob SeamanTuesday, 9 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingClive D.W. FeatherThursday, 11 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchFriday, 12 January 2007
Timekeeping dataWarner LoshFriday, 12 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingSteve AllenFriday, 12 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingPeter BunclarkMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term schedulingTony FinchMonday, 15 January 2007
NTP on MarsPeter BunclarkMonday, 15 January 2007
The Martian ChroniclesRob SeamanMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: The Martian ChroniclesRob SeamanMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] The Martian ChroniclesZeframMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] The Martian ChroniclesTony FinchMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: The Martian ChroniclesSteve AllenMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] The Martian ChroniclesPoul-Henning KampMonday, 15 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] The Martian ChroniclesPoul-Henning KampMonday, 15 January 2007
UT1 confidenceZeframWednesday, 17 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidencePoul-Henning KampWednesday, 17 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceWarner LoshWednesday, 17 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceSteve AllenWednesday, 17 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceM. Warner LoshWednesday, 17 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceRob SeamanThursday, 18 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceSteve AllenThursday, 18 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceTony FinchThursday, 18 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceZeframThursday, 18 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceM. Warner LoshThursday, 18 January 2007
[LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceRobert JonesWednesday, 17 January 2007
Re: [LEAPSECS] UT1 confidenceSteve AllenThursday, 18 January 2007
Leapsecs Listserve Movingmatsakis.demetrios_at_usno.navy.milWednesday, 31 January 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:56 PDT