Re: [LEAPSECS] Problems with GLONASS Raw Receiver Data at Start of New Year

From: Rob Seaman <>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:22:26 -0700

On Jan 14, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Richard Langley wrote:

> The problem existed for only 2-1/2 minutes, not hours.

Thanks for the clarification.

> Might be coincidental with the leap second but I've not noticed
> this problem at other times.

Would be a significant coincidence. Any simple explanation for the
90 second lag in the issue being triggered? The latency associated
with emergent behavior is of interest in itself.

> Stations were not running during the previous leap second.

Right - that's a central fact influencing policy. That different
groups take this to imply that different choices should be made adds
a little spice to the discussion :-)

> UNB1 Web page is here: <>.
> IGS Central Bureau Web page is here: <>

Thanks for the pointers.

Rob Seaman
Received on Sun Jan 15 2006 - 06:22:51 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT