Re: [LEAPSECS] The real problem with leap seconds

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:44:41 +0100

In message <Pine.GSO.4.58.0601091035560.22400_at_cass18>, Peter Bunclark writes:
>On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> I don't think anybody dare even think about redefining POSIX time_t
>
>I wish people would stop making positive assertions about what other
>people are bound to think. What you mean in is, YOU are against
>suggesting changing (or augmenting) POSIX time.

No, I mean exactly what I wrote: "I don't think anybody dare even
think about redefining POSIX time_t"

The reason I mean that is that I've talked to a lot of the relevant
people and they're all totally morified about the consequences
of (time_t % 86400) not giving you the time of day.

Remember, most of these people are even afraid to extend time_t to
64 bits because of the possible fall-out :-(


--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Mon Jan 09 2006 - 02:54:56 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT