Re: [LEAPSECS] The opportunity of leap seconds

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_PHK.FREEBSD.DK>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:55:43 +0100

In message <20060108151739.GA2665_at_ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:

>> Something as simple as
>>
>> finger ut1_at_bipm.fr
>>
>> Or even just a more stringent formatting of the bulletins on the ftp
>> site could do it as well.
>
>I do not believe that any of the IERS bureaus have internet
>connections and servers which are anywhere near robust and redundant
>enough to make that a reliable service.
>
>There is a lot that could and should be done.

I'm certainly starting to get the impression that a modernization
project to move the "time-lords" a few decades forward would not
be out of order.

>(Despite some NTP servers which reportedly still have not acknowledged
>the leap second, I think the overall indications are that the NTP
>network did better than 50 %.)

My estimate is 50-70% of the pool.ntp.org servers did something close
enough to the right thing.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sun Jan 08 2006 - 08:06:28 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 04 2010 - 09:44:55 PDT