In message <038FB18B-CD13-4AB6-BDFC-7995B92954F9_at_noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
>On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> As I understood it, it was mainly that TAI is a post-factum
>> "postal" timescale.
>
>One is left pondering the fact that UTC is now (and would remain
>under any changes I've heard suggested) a time scale based on TAI.
>What magic makes one acceptable and the other not?
I didn't say I thought the protest against more widespread use
made sense, I merely tried to relay it faithfully.
I does sound consistent with previously mentioned old fashionedness.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sun Jan 08 2006 - 08:23:27 PST